QA & Testing
End-to-end test automation, performance benchmarking, accessibility audits, and continuous quality gates that ship confidence into every release.
E2E test automation with Playwright and Cypress
Unit and integration testing strategy and implementation
Performance load testing (k6, Artillery)
Accessibility audits (WCAG 2.2 AA, axe-core, screen-reader)
CI/CD quality gate integration
Test coverage uplift and tech debt triage
Engineering teams shipping often but lacking confidence in regressions
Products with complex user flows requiring reliable automated coverage
Companies needing accessibility compliance reports for regulated industries
What is the difference between unit, integration, and E2E tests?
Unit tests verify individual functions in isolation. Integration tests check that modules work together. E2E tests simulate real user flows in a browser. We recommend a testing pyramid: many fast unit tests, moderate integration tests, and focused E2E tests on critical user paths.
Can you add testing to an existing codebase with no tests?
Yes — this is the most common scenario we encounter. We start with a coverage audit, prioritise the highest-risk paths (auth, payments, core flows), add tests incrementally, and establish the CI gate so new code stays covered.
How do you handle flaky tests?
Flaky tests are fixed, not skipped. We use stable selectors, explicit wait strategies (no arbitrary sleeps), request mocking where appropriate, and isolated test data so tests never depend on shared state or ordering.
Do you test for accessibility?
Yes. Every E2E suite we write includes axe-core integration to catch WCAG violations automatically. We also run manual keyboard and screen-reader checks on critical flows, and document findings with WCAG criterion references.